This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Nonlinear viscoelastic parameters obtained from a large-amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) test have widely received attention in polymer nanocomposite (PNC) characterization. Previously, we reported that nonlinear parameters, Q 0 and NLR (nonlinear–linear viscoelastic ratio) from FT-rheology, better-characterized filler dispersion in PNCs than the linear viscoelastic parameters of the small-amplitude oscillatory shear (SAOS) test and concluded that nonlinear parameters could detect the interfacial area much more sensitively than linear parameters [ Kim, M. Macromolecules 2019, 52, 8604]. To confirm this, we systemically manipulated clay dispersion states of polypropylene (PP)/clay PNCs in this study by applying an electric field (EF). An EF can easily manipulate the dispersion quality of clays, i.e., tactoid, intercalation, and exfoliation in a polymer matrix, by controlling the application time. The clay dispersion was examined using the rheological properties of SAOS and LAOS tests. The linear viscoelastic properties (| G *|) from the SAOS test increased monotonically with increasing clay content and EF application time. In contrast, the nonlinear rheological properties ( Q 0 ) by FT-rheology from the LAOS test exhibited more prominent and sensitive growth. When the concentration of clay increased without EF application (φ = 1, 3, and 5 wt %), | G *|(φ)/| G *|(PP) increased from 1 to 2.05, whereas Q 0 (φ)/ Q 0 (PP) increased from 1 to 22.8. In 5 wt % clay PNC, EF was applied in increments of 3, 7, 10, 20, and 30 min. With increasing EF application time, | G *|(5 wt %)/| G *|(PP) increased from 1 to 3.24, while Q 0 (5 wt %)/ Q 0 (PP) increased significantly from 1 to 13,540.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: