Preclinical study reveals consistent retroviral integration patterns in engineered CAR T cells, indicating safety for ADA1/CD26 co-transduction strategies.
Background: Retroviral vectors remain widely used for CAR T-cell manufacturing, including emerging multi-component engineering strategies that incorporate additional functional modules to enhance therapeutic performance. However, genome-wide profiling of integration patterns in CAR T cells subjected to multiplex retroviral engineering has not previously been reported. Methods: We performed genome-wide profiling of retroviral integration sites in CAR T-cell products derived from two targeting platforms (IL15-GPC3 and HER2). Each platform was evaluated under conditions with or without co-transduction of a retroviral vector encoding ADA1 and CD26. Experiments were conducted using cells obtained from a single donor with three technical replicates. Vector copy number (VCN), chromosomal distribution, genomic feature annotation, and integration hotspot analyses were conducted. Results: VCN levels were comparable across all CAR T-cell products and were not significantly affected by ADA1/CD26 co-expression. Integration events were broadly distributed across the genome with enrichment in gene-dense chromosomal regions. Chromosome 19 showed a prominent integration preference, with a secondary enrichment observed on chromosome 17. The majority of integration sites were located within intronic regions, with no enrichment observed in promoter regions. Recurrent integration hotspots were identified; however, no evidence of dominant clonal expansion was observed across conditions. Comparative analyses between ADA1/CD26 and control groups showed minimal differences in integration patterns. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study provides the first comprehensive, genome-wide characterization of retroviral integration site profiles in CAR T-cell products manufactured by multi-vector co-transduction with an ADA1/CD26 module. By employing harmonized comparison with external reference datasets, we offer a directly benchmarked integration site characterization of multi-component CAR T-cell manufacturing. These findings establish a reference framework for integration site monitoring in next-generation CAR T-cell engineering systems and inform risk evaluation for emerging combinatorial vector strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: