Theoretical study demonstrates the elimination of mathematical singularities via generalized division by zero, suggesting a globally continuous number system with mod-8 periodicity.
Natural law knows no forbidden operations. The rule that 0 cannot be a divisor is a human convention for computation, not a necessity of nature. Bu-Theory removes this convention and extends classical laws into 0 and ∞, revealing that singularities are artifacts of the prohibition, not defects of the continuum.noindent Natural law has no forbidden zone. For the sake of computation, human mathematics artificially imposed the rule ``zero cannot be a divisor.'' This rule creates various discontinuities and singularities (removable, essential, oscillatory). They are not defects of nature, but scars of the prohibition. Bu-Theory removes this rule, extending classical laws into zero and infinity, so that 1/0=∞. Thus nature itself is perfect without flaw; discontinuity no longer exists. Classical analysis stops at singularities. Cauchy principal value goes around. Residue theorem avoids them via contours. Distribution theory introduces the δ function as a generalized object, but does not answer ``what is the value at the discontinuity itself.'' These tools are effective, but they share the same premise: zero cannot be a divisor. Bu-Theory removes this premise, thereby obtaining a globally connected operational world. This paper is the foundational document of the Bu-Theory system. Three indivisible primitive axioms constitute the entire foundation; all remaining rules are derived as theorems. Section 2 gives the axioms and core theorems. Section 3 expounds point-embryo globality and gap-filling activation (including proof of the Perfect Analyticity Theorem). Section 4 establishes gap-filling calculus. Section 5 lists operation tables. Section 6 shows the simplest computational examples. Section 7 gives a global singularity quick-reference table. Section 8 number-system extensions. Section 9 derives the mod-8 periodicity from the four homomorphisms. Section 10 explains the relation to classical mathematics. Section 11 gives the conclusion. Appendices contain complete technical details.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng Lu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: