Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates an axiomatic framework that resolves arithmetic singularities like division by zero, indicating a unified bridge between dialectical logic and classical calculus.
This paper proposes a new axiomatic system based on dialectical logic—Buxue (the study of "bud" or "embryonic" points)—which extends classical arithmetic into a global domain containing singularities by introducing the structure of "point-embryo" at the axiomatic level. Three indivisible primitive axioms constitute the entire foundation: Axiom I defines the point-embryo ϑ=(0,1), realizing the topological identification 0=1 inside a Möbius ring; Axiom II removes the prohibition that "zero cannot be a divisor", stipulating 1/0=∞, thereby opening the forbidden zone; Axiom III closes the number line into a topological circle (S 1, the projective line), connecting +∞ and −∞ at ∞. Based on this, we establish the calculus of "Bu-duan" (supplementing breaks/discontinuities), prove the Point-Embryo Perfect Analyticity Theorem (all-order derivatives exist and are unique), and the Residue Order Theorem (giving closed-form values for all-order derivatives at poles). We also construct a forgetful projection π to strictly interface with classical mathematics: on classical domains of definition, π∘B=id, so classical results are the first projection layer of point-embryo mathematics, while the "revolutionary" information inside point-embryos (e.g., branch windings, infinite-order derivative spectra) is either controlled-leaked or reduced to zero under projection. The number system is extended via Clifford algebras to the global domain, and the mod 8 periodicity is derived from the four-homomorphism algebra. This is a foundational manifesto, presenting core insights in a declarative and explanatory style; all conclusions are derived geometrically and topologically within the Buxue axiomatic system, with classical field axioms and limit processes fully preserved as special cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng Lu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: