Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The in vitro activity of cefaclor, cephalothin and cefadroxil to 50 Escherichia coli, 23 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 20 Proteus mirabilis strains was tested with the disc diffusion and microdilution plate techniques. Cefaclor was more active than cefadroxil, while cephalothin was intermediate. The differences seriously affected the classification into the routine SIR system. For susceptibility testing we question the use of cephalothin as a class representative of oral cephalosporins.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larsson et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: