Key result
Isometric contraction eliminated the resting difference in F response persistence between the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles, indicating an increased central excitatory state.
Why the study?
Does isometric contraction alter F response persistence and amplitude in the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles in normal subjects?
Observational (n=14)
Does isometric contraction alter F response persistence and amplitude in the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles in normal subjects?
p-value: p=<0.001
Isometric contraction increases the central excitatory state of the tibialis anterior to a level at least as great as its antagonist antigravity muscles.
F responses were recorded from the surface of the tibialis muscle and medial aspect of the soleus muscle in 14 normal subjects. The persistence (that is the fraction of measurable F responses found with a series of supramaximal stimuli) and average F amplitudes (measured peak-to-peak and based on at least five F responses) were determined both at rest and with isometric contraction with the ankle maintained at 90 degrees. Although the persistence at rest was significantly less in the tibialis anterior soleus than the (p less than 0.001), no significant difference was found with the muscles contracted. This was associated with a significant increase in both average F amplitudes and average F amplitude/direct motor response ratios in the tibialis anterior in comparison to the soleus. In four of the subjects, studies were also performed when the H reflex in the soleus muscle was eliminated by thigh compression. Comparable changes in both F response persistence and average F amplitude were found with and without an H reflex. These data indicate that, in contrast to the situation at rest, with isometric contraction the "central excitatory state" of the tibialis anterior is at least as great as in its antagonist antigravity muscles and that this is not due simply to increased large fiber reflex input associated with agonist contraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris A. Fisher (1980) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=14). Isometric contraction vs. Rest was evaluated on F response persistence and average F amplitudes (p=<0.001). Isometric contraction eliminated the resting difference in F response persistence between the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles, indicating an increased central excitatory state.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: