Why the study?
Approval of onasemnogene abeparvovec for spinal muscular atrophy 5q type 1 in several countries prompted an independent assessment of evidence regarding its efficacy and safety.
Does onasemnogene abeparvovec improve survival and motor function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1?
Meta-Analysis (n=67)
Open-label
Does onasemnogene abeparvovec improve survival and motor function in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1?
Onasemnogene abeparvovec shows high rates of global and event-free survival at 12 months in SMA type 1, though evidence is limited by non-comparative study designs.
BACKGROUND: Onasemnogene abeparvovec has been approved for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy 5q type 1 in several countries, which calls for an independent assessment of the evidence regarding efficacy and safety. OBJECTIVE: Conduct a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec in patients diagnosed with SMA type 1, based on the available evidence. METHODS: This article results from searches conducted on databases up to November 2022. Outcomes of interest were global survival and event-free survival, improvement in motor function and treatment-related adverse events. Risk of bias assessment and certainty of evidence were performed for each outcome. Proportional meta-analysis models were performed when applicable. RESULTS: Four reports of three open-label, non-comparative clinical trials covering 67 patients were included. Meta-analyses of data available in a 12-month follow-up estimate a global survival of 97.56% (95%CI: 92.55 to 99.86, I2 = 0%, n = 67), an event-free survival of 96.5% (95%CI: 90.76 to 99.54, I2 = 32%, n = 66) and a CHOP-INTEND score ≥ 40 points proportion of 87.28% (95%CI: 69.81 to 97.83, I2 = 69%, n = 67). Proportion of 52.64% (95%CI: 27.11 to 77.45, I2 = 78%, n = 67) of treatment-related adverse events was estimated. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a potential change in the natural history of type 1 SMA, but the methodological limitations of the studies make the real extent of the technology's long-term benefits uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernandes et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (n=67). Onasemnogene abeparvovec was evaluated on Global survival (95% CI 92.55 to 99.86).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: