Key result
Female partners of prostate cancer patients participating in a community-based football program reported that the intervention fostered hope, mutual commitment, and restored gender roles, despite some unmet partner support needs.
Why the study?
Prostate cancer is often labelled a couple's disease where partners play an important role, but partner experiences of patients' engagement with a community-based football program were unexplored.
What are the experiences of female partners of prostate cancer patients engaging in a community-based football program?
What are the experiences of female partners of prostate cancer patients engaging in a community-based football program?
Partners of prostate cancer survivors engaging in community-based football experience positive dyadic coping and long-term exercise adherence, though some unforeseen challenges exist.
Partner experiences suggest community football programs may enhance supportive care; leaves open effects on adherence and outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is often labelled a couple's disease wherein the partner plays an important role in the man's illness management and related health promotion activities. The aim of this study was to explore partner experiences of prostate cancer patients' engagement with a community-based football program. METHODS: Eight audio-visual recorded semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted with a total of 39 female partners of men with prostate cancer who participated in a community-based football program as part of the nationwide FC Prostate Community Trial (NCT02430792). Data was managed with the software program Nvivo 11 and analysed inductively to derive thematic findings. RESULTS: The four thematic findings were: 1) 'Hope of a new beginning' which included stories of hope that football would mitigate the negative effects of men's prostate cancer treatment [s]; 2) 'My new partner' was characterized by attributing connections between physical activity and elevated mood as a by-product of men's involvement in the program; 3) 'Football first' included assertions of the couples mutual commitment to the football program; and 4) 'Invisible needs' contrasted insecurity, and unforeseen challenges for partners feeling somewhat neglected. Overall, the results confirm the need for cohesion and flexibility amongst couple-dyads to ensure partners and men with prostate cancer benefit from their involvement in football programs. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that partners of prostate cancer survivors' engaging with community-based football align to idealized gender relations, roles and identities. In many instances, these gendered dimensions aided positive dyadic coping and long-term exercise adherence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Midtgaard et al. (2021) studied Prostate cancer (partners of patients) (n=39). Community-based football program was evaluated on Partner experiences (qualitative themes). Female partners of prostate cancer patients participating in a community-based football program reported that the intervention fostered hope, mutual commitment, and restored gender roles, despite some unmet partner support needs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: