Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tunnelling-induced ground movements are complicated and investigations into them normally require some simplifications. This paper provides a brief literature review which highlights the advantages of adopting simplifications in physical modelling and addresses some of the deficiencies in the assessment of soil deformation due to a simulated tunnel excavation. A set of centrifuge tests modelling a tunnel heading located at different depths in clay was carried out at 125g. The tunnel was modelled by a semi-circular cavity partly supported by a stiff lining. The unlined tunnel heading was supported by a thin rubber bag supplied with compressed air pressure. Tunnel excavation was simulated by reducing air pressure. The induced ground movements at the subsurface and surface were measured by a 2D image analysis and a new, novel 3D imaging system. The results show that the experiment successfully reproduced key aspects of tunnelling-induced soil deformation in practice. In addition, a new equation to predict horizontal displacements in the longitudinal direction is proposed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Le et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: