Key result
Digital cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved daily steps, physical activity, medication adherence, functional capacity, and LDL-cholesterol compared to usual care across 25 RCTs.
Why the study?
Although digital cardiac rehabilitation is likely an effective alternative to centre-based programmes, understanding of the behaviour change techniques and intervention characteristics included in these programmes remains limited.
Does digital cardiac rehabilitation improve behavioural and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease compared to usual care or centre-based rehabilitation?
Systematic Review
Does digital cardiac rehabilitation improve behavioural and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease compared to usual care or centre-based rehabilitation?
Digital cardiac rehabilitation is an effective alternative to centre-based programs, significantly improving physical activity, medication adherence, and functional capacity.
Supports digital cardiac rehabilitation as an alternative to usual care; extends RCT evidence to behavioral and clinical endpoints in CVD.
Evidence suggests that digitally delivered cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is likely to be an effective alternative to centre-based CR. However, there is limited understanding of the behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and intervention characteristics included in digital CR programmes. This systematic review aimed to identify the BCTs and intervention characteristics that have been used in digital CR programmes, and to study those associated with effective programmes. Twenty-five randomised controlled trials were included in the review. Digital CR was associated with significant improvements in daily steps, light physical activity, medication adherence, functional capacity, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol when compared to usual care, and produced effects on these outcomes comparable to centre-based CR. The evidence for improved quality of life was mixed. Interventions that were effective at improving behavioural outcomes frequently employed BCTs relating to feedback and monitoring, goals and planning, natural consequences, and social support. Completeness of reporting on the TIDieR checklist across studies ranged from 42% to 92%, with intervention material descriptions being the most poorly reported item. Digital CR appears effective at improving outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease. The integration of certain BCTs and intervention characteristics may lead to more effective interventions, however better intervention reporting is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenny et al. (2023) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease. Digital cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care and centre-based CR was evaluated on Daily steps, light physical activity, medication adherence, functional capacity, and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Digital cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved daily steps, physical activity, medication adherence, functional capacity, and LDL-cholesterol compared to usual care across 25 RCTs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: