Why the study?
Does QRS prolongation predict the incidence of new coronary heart disease in a general population cohort?
Does QRS prolongation predict the incidence of new coronary heart disease in a general population cohort?
QRS duration on baseline ECG is not a significant predictor of future coronary heart disease incidence in a general population.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Baseline QRS prolongation does not predict incident CHD in community cohorts; leaves open its prognostic role in higher-risk groups or with serial ECGs.
The Framingham Study cohort of 5209 white men and women was examined to determine the long-term incidence of manifestations of new coronary heart disease as a function of QRS interval on subjects' baseline electrocardiograms (recorded at the 9th biennial examination). Over 18 years of follow-up, age-adjusted incidence of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and coronary death appeared unrelated to baseline QRS prolongation in both sexes, by Cox regression. Subjects with left bundlebranch block fared no worse than those with right pattern. These relations held whether or not subjects with baseline electrocardiographic abnormalities other than intraventricular block were excluded from consideration. In sum, QRS duration is an unimportant predictor of coronary disease in this Framingham population. (Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1365-1368)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
B. E. Kreger (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: