Key result
An automatic multiparameter strategy for quantifying vasa vasorum neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound improved diagnostic performance (AUROC 78-90) compared to manual interpretation.
Why the study?
Does an automatic multiparameter strategy improve diagnostic performance for quantifying adventitial vasa vasorum neovascularization in carotid CEUS compared to manual interpretation?
Observational (n=186)
Does an automatic multiparameter strategy improve diagnostic performance for quantifying adventitial vasa vasorum neovascularization in carotid CEUS compared to manual interpretation?
An automatic multiparameter strategy for carotid CEUS image analysis improves diagnostic speed and accuracy for quantifying adventitial vasa vasorum compared to manual methods.
Automated CEUS analysis of adventitial vasa vasorum may enable early atherosclerosis detection; leaves open validation in prospective cohorts before clinical use.
Adventitial vasa vasorum are physiologic microvessels that nourish artery walls. In the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, these microvessels proliferate abnormally. Studies have reported that they are the first stage of atheromatous disease. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of the carotid allows direct, quantitative and non-invasive visualization of the adventitial vasa vasorum. Hence, the development of computer-assisted methods that speed image analysis and eliminate user subjectivity is important. We developed methods for automatic analyses and quantification of vasa vasorum neovascularization in CEUS and tested these methods in a cohort of 186 individuals, 63 of whom were healthy volunteers. We implemented alternative automatic strategies for using the images to stratify patients according to their risk group and compare the strategies with respect to diagnostic performance. An automatic single-parameter strategy performs less effectively than the corresponding Arcidiacono method based on manual interpretation of the images (68 < area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] for the manual Arcidiacono method < 82; 60 < AUROC for the automatic single-parameter strategy < 63). However, by use of additional image parameters, an automatic multiparameter strategy has significantly improved performance with respect to the manual Arcidiacono method (78 < AUROC < 90). The automatic multiparameter strategy is a valuable alternative to the manual Arcidiacono method, improving both diagnostic speed and diagnostic accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk (n=186). Automatic multiparameter strategy vs. Manual Arcidiacono method was evaluated on Diagnostic performance (AUROC) for risk group stratification (AUROC 78-90). An automatic multiparameter strategy for quantifying vasa vasorum neovascularization on contrast-enhanced ultrasound improved diagnostic performance (AUROC 78-90) compared to manual interpretation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: