Key result
Women undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than matched men for both mechanical (8.94% vs 6.79%) and bioprosthetic (6.51% vs 5.42%) valves.
Why the study?
The study aimed to examine trends in SAVR incidence between women and men in Spain from 2001 to 2015, compare in-hospital outcomes by gender for mechanical and bioprosthetic valves, and identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
Does female gender increase in-hospital mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement compared to male gender?
Observational (n=86,578)
Yes
Does female gender increase in-hospital mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement compared to male gender?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.94% vs 6.79%
p-value: p=<0.001
Women undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement have significantly higher in-hospital mortality than men, even after propensity score matching.
Women had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality after SAVR; leaves open whether sex-specific factors require targeted investigation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: we aim to examine trends in the incidence of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) among women and men in Spain from 2001 to 2015; compare in-hospital outcomes for mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR by gender and; to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality (IHM) after SAVR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database, 2001-15. We included patients that had SAVR as procedure in their discharge report. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to assess the impact of gender on the outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR. RESULTS: We identified 86 578 patients who underwent SAVR (40% women). Incidence of SVAR was higher in men (incidence rate ratio 1.57; 95%CI 1.55-1.59). In 2001, 73.36% of the men and 71.57% of women received a mechanical prosthesis; these proportions decreased to 43.04% in men and 35.89% in women in 2015, whereas bioprosthetic SAVR increased to 56.96% and 64.11%. After PSM we found that IHM was higher in women than in matched men for mechanical (8.94% vs. 6.79%; P < 0.001) and bioprosthetic (6.51 vs. 5.42%; P = 0.001) SAVR. The mean length of hospital stay was longer (19.54 vs. 18.74 days; P < 0.001) among females than males undergoing mechanical SAVR. Higher IHM after SAVR was associated with older age, comorbidities (except diabetes and atrial fibrillation), concomitant coronary artery bypass graft and emergency room admission. CONCLUSIONS: This nation-wide analysis over 15 years of gender-specific outcomes after SAVR showed that, after PSM women have significantly higher IHM after mechanical and bioprosthetic SAVR than men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
López‐de‐Andrés et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) (n=86,578). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on In-hospital mortality after mechanical SAVR (p=<0.001). Women undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement had significantly higher in-hospital mortality than matched men for both mechanical (8.94% vs 6.79%) and bioprosthetic (6.51% vs 5.42%) valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: