Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of the study was to investigate the (anti)estrogenic, (anti)androgenic and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) agonistic activities of a mixture of acid condensation products of indole-3-carbinol, termed RXM, and to identify the compounds most responsible for the observed effects, using in vitro receptor-reporter gene transcriptional activation bioassays. For this, HPLC-fractions of RXM were prepared and tested. LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out for the identification of some of the acid condensation products. The RXM displayed weak estrogenic and anti-androgenic, and strong AhR agonistic properties. The fraction containing 3,3-diindolylmethane (DIM) displayed a weak estrogenic and relatively strong anti-androgenic activity. DIM was confirmed to be an androgen receptor (hAR) antagonist and a partial estrogen receptor (hERα) agonist. Also the fraction containing the trimer [2-(indol-3-ylmethyl)indol-3-yl]indol-3-ylmethane (LTr1) showed anti-androgenic activities. It was shown for the first time that DIM is not only estrogenic and anti-androgenic, but also possesses anti-estrogenic properties. Though indolo[3,2-b]carbazole (ICZ) is a potent AhR activator and was detected in the RXM, it did not contribute to AhR-agonist activity. Instead, fractions containing the trimers LTr1 and 5,6,11,12,17,18-hexahydrocyclonona[1,2-b:4,5-b′:7,8-b″]tri-indole (CTr), as well as some unidentified compounds showed the highest AhR activation. The fraction, containing the linear trimer LTr1, showed a weak anti-androgenic activity which has not been reported before. The study demonstrates the importance of a bioassay directed approach for identifying compounds that contribute most to the effects of mixtures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amare et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: