Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The decision to seek medical help for recurrent myocardial infarction is a complex process influenced by cognitive, emotional, and contextual factors, suggesting that simply providing symptom information is insufficient to prevent delays.
Objective: To identify the themes that influence decision making processes used by patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Design: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. Setting: Two district hospitals in North Yorkshire. Participants: 22 patients admitted to hospital with confirmed second, third, or fourth acute myocardial infarction. Main outcome measure: Patients' perceptions of their experience between the onset of symptoms and the decision to seek medical help. Results: Six main themes that influence the decision making process were identified: appraisal of symptoms, perceived risk, previous experience, psychological and emotional factors, use of the NHS, and context of the event. Conclusions: Knowledge of symptoms may not be enough to promote prompt action in the event of an acute myocardial infarction. Cognitive and emotional processes, individual beliefs and values, and the influence of the context of the event should also be considered in individual interventions designed to reduce delay in the event of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. What is already known on this topic Individual sociodemographic and clinical characteristics affect the time to seeking medical care in patients with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction Appraisal of symptoms is difficult; people with classic and severe symptoms are more likely to take prompt action What this study adds The decision to seek medical help in patients who have had one or more previous myocardial infarctions is a complex process Simply providing patients with information on symptoms of acute myocardial infarction, and what to do in the event of these symptoms, may not be sufficient to promote prompt action
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jill Pattenden (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: