Key result
High sport specialization in youth athletes was associated with increased odds of reporting a previous injury compared with low specialization (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.26-2.02; P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does high sport specialization and excessive training volume increase the risk of injury in youth athletes?
Case-Control (n=2,011)
Does high sport specialization and excessive training volume increase the risk of injury in youth athletes?
Odds Ratio: 1.59 (95% CI 1.26–2.02)
p-value: p=<.001
High levels of sport specialization and excessive training volume are associated with an increased history of injuries, including overuse injuries, in youth athletes.
May warrant counseling against high youth specialization; leaves open prospective confirmation of causality.
BACKGROUND: Recommendations exist to encourage safe youth participation in sport. These recommendations include not specializing in 1 sport, limiting participation to less than 8 months per year, and limiting participation to fewer hours per week than a child's age. However, limited evidence exists to support or refute these recommendations. HYPOTHESIS: High levels of specialization will be associated with a history of injuries and especially overuse injuries, independent of age, sex, or weekly sport training hours. Athletes who exceed current sport volume recommendations will be more likely to have a history of injuries and overuse injuries. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Youth athletes (n = 2011; 989 female and 1022 male; 12-18 years of age) completed a questionnaire regarding their specialization status, yearly and weekly sport participation volume, and injury history. Specialization was classified as low, moderate, or high using a previously utilized 3-point scale. Athletes were classified into groups based on either meeting or exceeding current volume recommendations (months per year and hours per week). Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were calculated to investigate associations of specialization and volume of participation with a history of sport-related injuries in the past year ( P ≤ .05). RESULTS: Highly specialized athletes were more likely to report a previous injury of any kind ( P < .001; OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.26-2.02) or an overuse injury ( P = .011; OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07-1.99) in the previous year compared with athletes in the low specialization group. Athletes who played their primary sport more than 8 months of the year were more likely to report an upper extremity overuse injury ( P = .04; OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.06-2.80) or a lower extremity overuse injury ( P = .001; OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.22-2.30). Athletes who participated in their primary sport for more hours per week than their age (ie, a 16-year-old athlete who participated in his or her primary sport for more than 16 h/wk) were more likely to report an injury of any type ( P = .001; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.12-1.61) in the previous year. CONCLUSION: High levels of specialization were associated with a history of injuries, independent of age, sex, and weekly organized sport volume. Athletes who exceeded volume recommendations were more likely to have a history of overuse injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Parents and youth athletes should be aware of the risks of specialization and excessive sport volume to maximize safe sport participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Post et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Sport-related injuries (n=2,011). High sport specialization vs. Low sport specialization was evaluated on Previous injury of any kind in the past year (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-2.02, p=<.001). High sport specialization in youth athletes was associated with increased odds of reporting a previous injury compared with low specialization (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.26-2.02; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: