Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable three-dimensional in-situ stress prediction is a key requirement for safe and efficient development of deep shale gas reservoirs, where stress heterogeneity controls hydraulic-fracture containment, wellbore stability, casing-deformation risk, and stimulation design. Empirical stress transforms are computationally efficient, but they are commonly limited by one-dimensional calibration and simplified geological assumptions. Finite-element modeling (FEM) accounts for three-dimensional structure and heterogeneous mechanical properties, but it remains too expensive for frequent operational updating. We develop a seismic-FEM physics-guided Fourier surrogate (PG-FNO) to predict the minimum and maximum horizontal stresses ( σ h and σ H ) in the Longmaxi-Wufeng shale gas reservoir of the Sichuan Basin. The workflow integrates seismic-derived elastic, pore pressure, overburden, and structural-curvature volumes with FEM stress simulation. A poroelastic analytical branch provides a mechanically interpretable baseline, while a Fourier neural branch learns spatial residual corrections to the baseline stress field. Under spatial holdout evaluation, PG-FNO achieves an overall test R 2 of 0.9835, RMSE of 3.236 MPa, and MAE of 0.515 MPa. These results demonstrate improved predictive performance relative to the PG-CNN and PG-UNet baselines under the same spatial holdout protocol. After training, full-volume inference requires only about 1 min, compared with approximately 4.5 d for the FEM simulation. Error diagnostics show that larger deviations are concentrated near faults and high-curvature zones, identifying structurally complex areas where additional calibration or monitoring would be most beneficial for engineering reliability. The proposed workflow provides a practical route for integrating seismic interpretation, numerical geomechanics, and deep learning into rapid 3D stress characterization for deep shale gas development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: