Key result
Animals routinely vaccinated twice against foot-and-mouth disease were not clinically affected, whereas disease incidence was observed among those vaccinated only once (p = 0.004).
Why the study?
Does routine and emergency vaccination prevent foot-and-mouth disease incidence in small ruminants during an outbreak?
Observational (n=2,090)
No
Does routine and emergency vaccination prevent foot-and-mouth disease incidence in small ruminants during an outbreak?
p-value: p=0.004
Routine vaccination twice and timely emergency vaccination are effective in preventing foot-and-mouth disease in small ruminants during an outbreak.
Two-dose FMD vaccination associated with protection in small ruminants; leaves open need for RCTs before practice change.
Routine and emergency vaccination of small ruminants against foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is mandatory in many endemic countries, yet data on the field effectiveness of the vaccines used is scarce. We conducted an investigation of a serotype O FMD outbreak that took place in a sheep and goat pen, and estimated the effectiveness of various routine vaccination statuses. We also evaluated the protection provided by colostrum administration and emergency vaccination. Animals which were routinely vaccinated twice were not clinically affected while disease incidence was observed among animals routinely vaccinated only once (p = 0.004 according to a two-sided Fisher's exact test). In groups vaccinated only once, there was a significant association between the average time that elapsed since last vaccination and the disease incidence (n = 5; Spearman correlation coefficient: rs = 1.0, p < 0.01). In addition, non-vaccinated lambs fed colostrum from dams vaccinated more than 2 months before parturition had a mortality rate of 33%. Administration of emergency vaccination 2 days after the occurrence of the index case was the probable reason for the rapid blocking of the FMD spread within 6 days from its onset in the pen.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elnekave et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) (n=2,090). Routine FMD vaccination (twice or more) vs. Routine FMD vaccination (once) was evaluated on Clinical FMD incidence (p=0.004). Animals routinely vaccinated twice against foot-and-mouth disease were not clinically affected, whereas disease incidence was observed among those vaccinated only once (p = 0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: