Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was aimed at evaluating perennial forages (timothy grass, alfalfa, and reed canary grass) as substrates for ethanol production. Two fractions, derived from the aqueous/steam fractionation of these plants, were used as carbon sources for ethanol production: (i) a solution containing water-soluble hemicelluloses and (ii) cellulosic fines recovered after a delignification step. Both fractions were enzymatically hydrolyzed. The hemicellulose-rich fraction was easily saccharified with 90% of theoretical yield. Cellulosic fines were saccharified at 60−70% of theoretical yield. Increasing the delignification of cellulosic fines by alkaline peroxide treatment resulted in higher sugar yields. The glucose-rich hydrolyzate from cellulosic fines was easily fermented to 80−90% of theoretical ethanol yield with Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Pachysolen tannophilus . The pentose-rich hydrolyzate from water-soluble hemicelluloses was fermented to only 20% of theoretical ethanol yield with Pachysolen tannophilus . A lime treatment of the hemicellulose-rich liquors improved cell growth but did not improve ethanol production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belkacemi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: