Key result
Sitagliptin improved left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in 75% of treated patients compared to 11% with bedtime NPH insulin.
Why the study?
Does sitagliptin improve left ventricular diastolic function compared to bedtime NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral therapy?
RCT (n=35)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does sitagliptin improve left ventricular diastolic function compared to bedtime NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral therapy?
Sitagliptin may improve left ventricular diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes independently of glucose control when compared to bedtime NPH insulin.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sitagliptin over bedtime NPH insulin for LV diastolic function in T2DM; extends DPP-4i benefits beyond glycemic control.
BACKGROUND: Blood glucose control is fundamental albeit not enough to prevent diabetic macrovascular complications. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are effective in improving metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) but little is known about its cardiovascular effects. We compared the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin with bedtime NPH insulin (NPH) as add-on therapy in patients with T2DM, aiming to ascertain which drug would have additional cardioprotective effects. METHODS: Thirty-five T2DM patients inadequately controlled with metformin plus glyburide were randomized to receive sitagliptin (n = 18) or NPH (n = 17) for 24 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, lipid profile, C-reactive protein, active glucagon-like peptide (aGLP-1) levels, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement and comprehensive 2-dimensional echocardiogram were determined before and after treatments. RESULTS: Both sitagliptin and NPH therapies decreased HbA1c levels after 24 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose and triglyceride levels decreased in the NPH group whereas only sitagliptin increased aGLP-1 levels. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) was detected in 58.6% of twenty-nine patients evaluated. Beneficial effects in LVDD were observed in 75% and 11% of patients treated with sitagliptin and NPH, respectively (p = 0.015). Neither therapy changed C-reactive protein or blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Sitagliptin and bedtime NPH were similarly effective on glucose control. Improvement in LVDD in T2DM patients treated with sitagliptin was suggested, probably related to the increase of aGLP-1 levels. Therefore, DPP-4 inhibitor seems to have cardioprotective effects independent of glucose control and may have a role in the prevention of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nogueira et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=35). Sitagliptin vs. Bedtime NPH insulin was evaluated on Improvement in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) (OR 24, 95% CI 1.74-331, p=0.015). Sitagliptin improved left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in 75% of treated patients compared to 11% with bedtime NPH insulin.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: