Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No AccessJournal of Speech and Hearing DisordersResearch Article1 Feb 1963Multiple-choice Intelligibility Tests, Forms A and B John W. Black, and C. Hess Haagen John W. Black Google Scholar and C. Hess Haagen Google Scholar https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.2801.77 SectionsAboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited by Lindsay E. Sleeth and Philip C. Doyle (2019) Intelligibility in Postlaryngectomy Speech Clinical Care and Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer10.1007/978-3-030-04702-3_14 IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering40:12 (1282-1298)1 Jan 1993A statistical causal model for the assessment of dysarthric speech and the utility of computer-based speech recognitionB.K. Sy and D.M. Horowitz Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology98:12 (960-964)1 Dec 1989Duration and Frequency Characteristics of Tracheoesophageal SpeechRebekah H. Pindzola and Blanche H. Cain Journal of Communication Disorders21:6 (437-445)1 Dec 1988Esophageal intelligibility training: Back consonants and clustersDiana Mase-Goldman, Elizabeth J. Allen and Alan C. Nichols Sigrid Fink (1988) Ein Instrument zur Messung der Verständlichkeit bei Dysarthrischen Sprechern Sprechwissenschaft & Psycholinguistik 210.1007/978-3-322-94162-6_6 Australian Journal of Human Communication Disorders12:1 (125-129)1 Jun 1984Material ReviewsDebra A. Bryan, Lesley Inglis and Julian M. Notermans Journal of Communication Disorders13:1 (33-41)1 Jan 1980Influence of passage familiarity on intelligibility estimates of dysarthric speechDavid R. Beukelman and Kathryn M. Yorkston Journal of Communication Disorders13:1 (15-31)1 Jan 1980A clinician-judged technique for quantifying dysarthric speech based on single-word intelligibilityKathryn M. Yorkston and David R. Beukelman Journal of Psycholinguistic Research8:4 (343-351)1 Jul 1979Clues to aural discriminationJohn W. Black, Leo V. Deal, Sadanand Singh and G. C. Tolhurst Journal of Communication Disorders11:6 (499-512)1 Dec 1978A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speechKathryn M. Yorkston and David R. Beukelman H. HOLLIEN and H.B. ROTHMAN (1976) Diver Communication Underwater Research10.1016/B978-0-12-221950-4.50004-7 Journal of Communication Disorders9:1 (27-41)1 Mar 1976Confusions in recognizing phonemes spoken by esophageal speakers: I. Initial consonants and clustersAlan C. Nichols Journal of Phonetics3:1 (9-16)1 Jan 1975Standardization of speech materials for use in underwater research: comparative intelligibility of monosyllabic word listsRobert F. Coleman and Harry Hollien Journal of Communication Disorders6:2 (110-120)1 Jan 1973The effects of training in comprehension of electrolaryngeal speechAlbert W. Knox and Martha Anneberg Quarterly Journal of Speech53:4 (361-364)1 Dec 1967Altering intelligibility through a self‐administered procedureJohn W. Black, Kathleen H. Lang and Sadanand Singh International Audiology6:3 (431-435)1 Jan 1967The Measurement of the Effectiveness with Which Hard-of-Hearing Individuals Discriminate SpeechKeith K. Neely Speech Monographs34:1 (98-101)1 Mar 1967A self‐administered technique in auditory trainingMyrtle Eddins Gillespie and John W. Black JOHN W. BLACK (1965) LANGUAGE BARRIERS AND LANGUAGE TRAINING Communication Processes10.1016/B978-0-08-010970-1.50013-9 Volume 28Issue 1February 1963Pages: 77-86 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Feb 1, 1963PubMed ID: 13971365 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-article-typesleader-topicsCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 1963 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Black et al. (1963) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: