Key result
Each unit increase in the Revised-Risk Analysis Index score was independently associated with a 2.3% increased odds of major morbidity and mortality (OR 1.023) in elderly patients after abdominal surgery.
Why the study?
The association between the revised-Risk Analysis Index and composite major morbidity and mortality in older surgical patients was largely unknown.
Does the revised-Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) predict major morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Cohort (n=2,225)
No
Does the revised-Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) predict major morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery?
Higher preoperative RAI-rev scores are independently associated with an increased risk of major morbidity and mortality in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform preoperative risk stratification in elderly abdominal surgery; extends frailty indices but remains hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Background The revised-Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) can accurately predict postoperative mortality risk. However, the association of RAI-rev with composite outcome of major morbidity and mortality (MMM) among elderly surgical patients is largely unknown. This study investigated the association between RAI-rev and postoperative MMM in older patients undergoing abdominal surgery. It also assessed the predictive value of RAI-rev combined with other preoperative risk factors. Methods This retrospective cohort study reviewed the medical records of all patients aged 65 and older who underwent abdominal surgery between January 2018 and December 2019. The primary outcome was the postoperative MMM during hospitalization, and its association with pre-operative RAI-rev scores was assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The prediction of postoperative outcomes was used the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Results A total of 2225 elderly patients were analyzed, and 258 (11.6%) developed postoperative MMM. After adjusting for confounders, each unit increase in RAI-rev scores resulted in a 2.3% increase in the MMM risk and a 3.0% increase in the odds of life-threatening complications and mortality (both P < 0.05). The area under the curves (AUCs) of RAI-rev scores in predicting MMM and life-threatening complications and mortality was 0.604 (95% CI: 0.567–0.640) and 0.633 (95% CI: 0.592 to 0.675), respectively (both P < 0.001); when the RAI-rev was combined with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, operative stress, and urgency status of surgery (emergency or elective), the AUCs were 0.691 (95% CI: 0.656–0.726) and 0.739 (95% CI: 0.702 to 0.777), respectively (both P < 0.001). Conclusions Higher RAI-rev scores were independently associated with increased risk of MMM. When combined with the ASA classification, operative stress, and urgency status of surgery, RAI-rev has improved performance in predicting the risk of MMM, particularly the life-threatening complications and mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery (n=2,225). Revised-Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) score vs. Lower RAI-rev score was evaluated on Postoperative major morbidity and mortality (MMM) during hospitalization (OR 1.023, 95% CI 1.003 to 1.044, p=0.026). Each unit increase in the Revised-Risk Analysis Index score was independently associated with a 2.3% increased odds of major morbidity and mortality (OR 1.023) in elderly patients after abdominal surgery.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: