Key result
The MELD Na exception policy was associated with a 90% transplantation rate compared to 49% for standard MELD, with comparable dropout rates and post-transplant survival.
Why the study?
Does MELD Na exception improve access to liver transplantation for hyponatremic cirrhotic patients compared to standard MELD?
Cohort (n=1,198)
Yes
Does MELD Na exception improve access to liver transplantation for hyponatremic cirrhotic patients compared to standard MELD?
Implementing a MELD Na exception for hyponatremic cirrhotic patients significantly improved their access to liver transplantation without compromising post-transplant survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Associated with higher transplant rates in hyponatremic cirrhotics; leaves open policy adoption pending prospective validation.
INTRODUCTION: Hyponatremia complicates cirrhosis and predicts short term mortality, including adverse outcomes before and after liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From April 1, 2008, through April 2, 2010, all adult candidates for primary liver transplantation with cirrhosis, listed in Region 11 with hyponatremia, were eligible for sodium (Na) exception. RESULTS: Patients with serum sodium (SNa) less than 130 mg/dL, measured two weeks apart and within 30 days of Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception request, were given preapproved Na exception. MELD Na was calculated [MELD + 1.59 (135-SNa/30 days)]. MELD Na was capped at 22, and subject to standard adult recertification schedule. On data end of follow-up, December 28, 2010, 15,285 potential U.S. liver recipients met the inclusion criteria of true MELD between 6 and 22. In Region 11, 1,198 of total eligible liver recipients were listed. Sixty-two (5.2%) patients were eligible for Na exception (MELD Na); 823 patients (68.7%) were listed with standard MELD (SMELD); and 313 patients (26.1%) received HCC MELD exception. Ninety percent of MELD Na patients and 97% of HCC MELD patients were transplanted at end of follow up, compared to 49% of Region 11 standard MELD and 40% of U.S.A. standard MELD (USA MELD) patients (p < 0.001); with comparable dropout rates (6.5, 1.6, 6.9, 9% respectively; p = 0.2). MELD Na, HCC MELD, Region 11 SMELD, and USA MELD post-transplant six-month actual patient survivals were similar (92.9, 92.8, 92.2, and 93.9 %, respectively). CONCLUSION: The Region 11 MELD Na exception prospective trial improved hyponatremic cirrhotic patient access to transplant equitably, and without compromising transplant efficacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Cirrhosis with hyponatremia (n=1,198). MELD Na exception vs. Standard MELD was evaluated on Transplantation rate at end of follow-up (p=< 0.001). The MELD Na exception policy was associated with a 90% transplantation rate compared to 49% for standard MELD, with comparable dropout rates and post-transplant survival.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: