Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to establish the prevalence, predictors and clinical consequences of vitamin D deficiency in patients with SLE. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients fulfilling ACR criteria for the classification of SLE. Serum 25(OH)D levels at 30 and 10 ng/ml were the cut-off values for vitamin D insufficiency and vitamin D deficiency, respectively. SLE activity was measured by SLEDAI and irreversible organ damage by the SLICC-ACR index. Fatigue was quantified using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Ninety-two patients (90% women, 98% white) were included in the study. Sixty-nine (75%) and 14 (15%) patients presented with vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency, respectively. Female sex (P = 0.001), treatment with HCQ (P = 0.014) and treatment with calcium and vitamin D (P = 0.049) predicted higher levels of 25(OH)D. Photosensitivity [odds ratio (OR) 3.5] and photoprotection (OR 5.7) predicted vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency, respectively. Higher age (OR 0.95) and HCQ use (OR 0.29) protected against vitamin D deficiency. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had a higher degree of fatigue as quantified by a 0-10 VAS (mean 5.32 vs 4.03, P = 0.08). No relation was seen between vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency and disease duration, SLEDAI or SLICC-ACR indexes. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are common in patients with SLE and are associated with sun avoidance. HCQ prevented vitamin D deficiency. Vitamin D deficiency was related to a higher degree of fatigue. Vitamin D levels had no relation with SLE severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruiz‐Irastorza et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: