Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report on the growth of CuInS 2 n-type semiconductive particles, prepared using a modified Czekelius’s colloidal method, as well as their chemical and electrochemical properties. Solid state Raman spectroscopy revealed two crystalline phases: chalcopyrite and the so-called copper−gold phase. Increasing the annealing temperature of the particles favors the formation of the chalcopyrite phase. As shown by XPS, EDX, and ICP-AES, an excess of indium was obtained, which was greater at the surface (CuIn 1.45 S 1.9 at 450 °C) than in the bulk (CuIn 1.04 S 1.74 at 450 °C). UV−visible measurements showed that the n-type CuInS 2 possesses a direct bandgap energy of 1.45 eV. Two organic redox couples in nonaqueous media were used to perform the capacitance measurements carried out by EIS on a CuInS 2 film: 5-mercapto-1-methyltetrazolate (T − )/di-5-(1-methyltetrazole) disulfide (T 2 ) and 5-trifluoromethyl-2-mercapto-1,3,4-thiadiazolate (G − )/5,5′-bis(2-trifluoromethyl-1,3,4-thiadiazole) disulfide (G 2 ). Fermi levels of −3.95 eV and −3.64 eV and majority charge carrier densities of 4.1 × 10 18 and 1.8 × 10 18 cm −3 were determined, respectively, using these redox couples. On the basis of the CuInS 2 /electrolyte energy level diagrams, the G − /G 2 redox couple is expected to lead to a more efficient device (greater photocurrent and photovoltage). In situ Raman spectroscopy measurements showed that the reactivity of copper with hexamethyldisilathiane is faster than with indium. This explains the excess of indium at the surface of the CuInS 2 particles, as well as its n-type semiconductivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Courtel et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: