Key result
Nutritional or protein supplementation in hip fracture patients improved clinical outcomes in 6 of 12 reviewed studies, whereas pharmacological interventions yielded unclear results.
Why the study?
Does nutritional or anabolic treatment improve clinical outcomes in hip fracture patients?
Does nutritional or anabolic treatment improve clinical outcomes in hip fracture patients?
Nutritional and anabolic interventions in hip fracture patients show mixed results, with some studies indicating improved clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for higher quality research.
Nutritional supplementation should not yet alter hip fracture care; leaves open efficacy pending higher-quality RCTs.
Patients suffering from hip fracture are known to be at risk of catabolism and protein-energy malnutrition. In this review we discuss the pathogenesis of hip fracture-related catabolism per- and postoperatively. We also describe the consequences of malnutrition after a hip fracture and summarize studies that have evaluated the effect of nutritional or anabolic treatment of these patients. There has been relatively little published on the effects of nutritional and anabolic pharmacological interventions for improvement of nutritional status and on the role of nutritional status in clinical outcomes. Even so, there have been 19 randomized studies in this field. 12 studies evaluated nutritional supplementation or protein supplementation. 6 found improved clinical outcome with fewer complications, faster recovery and shorter length of hospital stay, whereas the others reported no difference in clinical outcome. For pharmacological interventions, the outcomes have been even less clear. Supplementation studies in general appear to be underpowered or suffer logistic problems. Studies of higher scientific quality are needed, and enteral feeding, anabolic treatment and multimodal approaches need to be evaluated in greater depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hedström et al. (2006) conducted a review in Hip fracture. Nutritional and anabolic interventions was evaluated on Clinical outcomes. Nutritional or protein supplementation in hip fracture patients improved clinical outcomes in 6 of 12 reviewed studies, whereas pharmacological interventions yielded unclear results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: