Key result
Complete housing destruction was associated with a 0.81-unit greater change in body mass index (95% CI: 0.24, 1.38) compared with no housing damage 2.5 years after the disaster.
Why the study?
The long-term association between disaster experience and survivor cardiometabolic risk remained unclear, particularly after adjusting for pre-disaster health information.
Does traumatic disaster experience increase cardiometabolic risk in older adult survivors?
Cohort (n=1,195)
No
Does traumatic disaster experience increase cardiometabolic risk in older adult survivors?
Traumatic disaster experiences, particularly complete housing destruction, are associated with worsening cardiometabolic risk factors in older adults, highlighting the need for continued health support for victims.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant BMI monitoring after housing loss; leaves open causal cardiometabolic effects in older survivors.
We investigated the association between disaster experience and the cardiometabolic risk of survivors 2.5 years after disaster onset, adjusting for health information predating the disaster, using natural experiment data stemming from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. We used data from a cohort of adults aged 65 years or older in Iwanuma City, Japan, located 80 km (128 miles) west of the earthquake epicenter. The baseline survey was completed 7 months before the disaster, and the follow-up survey was performed among survivors approximately 2.5 years after the disaster. The survey data were linked to medical records with information on objectively measured cardiometabolic risk factors (n = 1,195). The exposure of interest was traumatic disaster experiences (i.e., housing damage and loss of loved ones). Fixed-effects regression showed that complete housing destruction was significantly associated with a 0.81-unit greater change in body mass index (weight (kg)/height (m)2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24, 1.38), a 4.26-cm greater change in waist circumference (95% CI: 1.12, 7.41), and a 4.77-mg/dL lower change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (95% CI: -7.96, -1.58) as compared with no housing damage. We also observed a significant association between major housing damage and decreased systolic blood pressure. Continued health checkups and supports for victims who lost homes should be considered to maintain their cardiometabolic health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiba et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Cardiometabolic risk (n=1,195). Complete housing destruction vs. No housing damage was evaluated on Change in body mass index (MD 0.81, 95% CI 0.24, 1.38). Complete housing destruction was associated with a 0.81-unit greater change in body mass index (95% CI: 0.24, 1.38) compared with no housing damage 2.5 years after the disaster.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: