Key result
The orthogeriatric care model reduced in-hospital mortality from 5.98% to 3.98% and decreased the mean unit length of stay from 12.44 to 10.46 days compared to traditional orthopedic care.
Why the study?
Does an orthogeriatric care model improve in-hospital mortality and length of stay in elderly patients with hip fractures compared to traditional orthopedic care?
Cohort (n=226)
Yes
Does an orthogeriatric care model improve in-hospital mortality and length of stay in elderly patients with hip fractures compared to traditional orthopedic care?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.98% vs 5.98%
An orthogeriatric care model for elderly patients with hip fractures may reduce in-hospital mortality and length of stay compared to traditional orthopedic care.
May support orthogeriatric models for hip fractures; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Introduction: Hip fractures in the elderly are a major source of morbidity and mortality. Interdisciplinary hospital care models proposed for the treatment of these patients include consultant teams, integrated orthopedic-geriatric care, and comprehensive geriatric-led care settings. A prospective interventional cohort study was conducted in 4 public hospitals in the Emilia-Romagna Region of Italy to compare the outcomes of these different care models. This report presents the preliminary results obtained with an orthogeriatric model in one of these centers, a large teaching hospital in Bologna. Materials and methods: Beginning in February 2008, all patients older than 75 years admitted to the University of Bologna’s Sant’Orsola-Malpighi Hospital for hip fractures were cared for in an orthogeriatric unit. The unit consisted of 10 beds in the orthopedic ward that were managed by a geriatric specialist and a multidisciplinary team, which met daily and included an orthopedic surgeon, a physiatrist, a nurse case-manager, staff nurses, a physical therapist, and a social worker. The management protocol included a thorough geriatric work-up to identify comorbidities and risk factors, systematic assessment and prevention of pain and acute disorientation, early verticalization and moblization, postacute rehabilitation therapy, family support, and regular follow-up after discharge. Preliminary results were compared with those achieved in the same orthopedic ward prior to the creation of the Orthogeriatric Unit. Results: During 2008, 226 elderly patients (mean age 86.2 + 5.5 years), 73.4% of whom were women, were admitted to the Orthogeriatric Unit for hip fractures. The mean Charlson comorbidity index of this cohort was 3.0 + 1.8). Half the patients had Activity of Daily Living scores < 4, and cognitive impairment was common (mean score on Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire: 5.9 + 3.2). Compared with figures obtained in the hospital’s orthopedic ward prior to 2008, in-hospital mortality dropped from 5.98% to 3.98%. The mean overall length of hospitalization was not significantly reduced, but the mean stay in the Orthogeriatric unit decreased by almost 2 days (to 10.46 days from 12.44 days in the traditional orthopedic unit). Discussion: Compared with traditional care models, the orthogeriatric model may allow better integration of the health-care resources available for the management of hip fractures in the elderly, and this improvement may have positive effects on the outcome of these cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frondini et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Hip fracture (n=226). Orthogeriatric care model vs. Traditional orthopedic ward (historical control) was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. The orthogeriatric care model reduced in-hospital mortality from 5.98% to 3.98% and decreased the mean unit length of stay from 12.44 to 10.46 days compared to traditional orthopedic care.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: