Why the study?
What is the incidence of wrong-level spinal surgery and are current prevention strategies effective?
What is the incidence of wrong-level spinal surgery and are current prevention strategies effective?
Current literature lacks definitive estimates on the incidence of wrong-site spinal surgery and evidence supporting the effectiveness of existing site-verification protocols.
Current protocols miss one-third of wrong-level spinal cases; challenges their reliability and leaves open need for stronger prevention strategies.
Wrong-level surgery is a unique pitfall in spinal surgery and is part of the wider field of wrong-site surgery. Wrong-site surgery affects both patients and surgeons and has received much media attention. We performed this systematic review to determine the incidence and prevalence of wrong-level procedures in spinal surgery and to identify effective prevention strategies. We retrieved 12 studies reporting the incidence or prevalence of wrong-site surgery and that provided information about prevention strategies. Of these, ten studies were performed on patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery and two on patients undergoing lumbar, thoracic or cervical spine procedures. A higher frequency of wrong-level surgery in lumbar procedures than in cervical procedures was found. Only one study assessed preventative strategies for wrong-site surgery, demonstrating that current site-verification protocols did not prevent about one-third of the cases. The current literature does not provide a definitive estimate of the occurrence of wrong-site spinal surgery, and there is no published evidence to support the effectiveness of site-verification protocols. Further prevention strategies need to be developed to reduce the risk of wrong-site surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Longo et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: