Key result
Systems-based programs and the JCAHO Universal Protocol, including surgical site marking and a pre-incision time out, have been implemented to address wrong patient, procedure, and site surgery.
Why the study?
Do systems-based safety programs prevent adverse events such as wrong patient, wrong procedure, and wrong site surgery in spinal procedures?
Do systems-based safety programs prevent adverse events such as wrong patient, wrong procedure, and wrong site surgery in spinal procedures?
Implementation of systems-based approaches like the JCAHO Universal Protocol is crucial for preventing catastrophic surgical errors in spinal procedures.
Protocols address wrong-site errors in spine surgery; leaves open whether they reduce events in practice.
In every spinal procedure, identifying the specific patient, proper surgical site, and pathologic lesion for surgical intervention are crucial patient safety concerns. The 1999 Institute of Medicine report "To Err is Human" identified adverse events associated with surgery. Both the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the North American Spine Society have had voluntary, systems-based programs in place for several years to address wrong patient, wrong procedure, and wrong site surgery. Beginning July 1, 2004, the Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations mandated that hospitals comply with the JCAHO Universal Protocol. In addition to surgical site marking, the protocol incorporates additional factors, such as calling a time out before skin incision to do a final systems check of patient identification, surgical site, records, imaging studies, equipment, and review of preoperative medication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David A. Wong (2006) conducted a review in Spinal surgery patient safety. Systems-based safety programs (JCAHO Universal Protocol) was evaluated. Systems-based programs and the JCAHO Universal Protocol, including surgical site marking and a pre-incision time out, have been implemented to address wrong patient, procedure, and site surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: