Key result
Immune dysregulation drives AF development, progression, and clinical outcomes across systematic review data.
Why the study?
Although individual studies have provided insights into immune dysregulation in AF, a comprehensive synthesis across histological, mechanistic, prognostic, and genetic domains was lacking.
Does immune dysregulation play a role in atrial fibrillation development and progression?
Systematic Review (n=16)
Does immune dysregulation play a role in atrial fibrillation development and progression?
Immune dysregulation, including T-cell infiltration and adipose-myocardial crosstalk, is a primary determinant of atrial fibrillation development and progression across multiple levels of evidence.
May inform immunomodulatory AF trials; extends histological evidence for immune-mediated remodeling.
Background: Immune dysregulation has emerged as a central mechanism in atrial fibrillation (AF), with accumulating evidence implicating T-cell subsets, cellular senescence, checkpoint dysfunction, and inflammatory signaling. Although individual studies have provided important insights, a comprehensive synthesis across histological, mechanistic, prognostic, and genetic domains has been lacking. Methods: We systematically reviewed 16 studies published between 2009 and 2025, encompassing histological investigations, translational and mechanistic analyses, interventional cohorts, prognostic studies, and Mendelian randomization. Data on immune cell subsets, cytokines, signaling pathways, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and RoB 2, while certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE framework. Results: Histological studies consistently demonstrated infiltration of atrial tissue by T lymphocytes and macrophages, with greater intensity in persistent and permanent AF, causally linked to atrial dilatation and fibrosis. Epicardial adipose tissue emerged as a key reservoir of tissue-resident memory T cells that promote IL-17- and IFN-γ-mediated fibroinflammatory remodeling. Mechanistic analyses highlighted CD8+PAR1+ cytotoxic T cells, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint disruption, and adipose–myocardial crosstalk as pivotal drivers of AF. Prognostic studies indicated that immune biomarkers provide incremental predictive value beyond conventional risk scores, while genetic evidence supported a causal role for immune dysregulation in AF susceptibility and progression. Conclusions: Across multiple levels of evidence, immune dysregulation is a primary determinant of AF development, progression, and outcomes. Integration of immune biomarkers into clinical practice may enhance risk stratification and inform the design of immune-targeted therapies for atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Menezes et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Atrial Fibrillation (n=16). Immune dysregulation was evaluated on Atrial fibrillation development, progression, and outcomes. A systematic review of 16 studies demonstrated that immune dysregulation is a primary determinant of atrial fibrillation development, progression, and outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: