Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cavity ring-down (CRD) spectroscopy and ab initio calculations have determined the reaction rate coefficients, mechanism, and thermochemistry relevant to the addition of a chlorine atom to allene. Chlorine atoms were produced by laser photolysis at 351 nm and the addition reaction products were probed at a variable delay by CRD spectroscopy using a second laser pulse. Ab initio results indicate that the only persistent addition product is the 2-chloroallyl (C 3 H 4 Cl) radical. We measured the continuum spectrum of the 2-chloroallyl radical between 238 and 252 nm and determined the absorption cross section, σ 240 (C 3 H 4 Cl) = (2.5 ± 0.5) × 10 -17 cm 2 . By fitting the C 3 H 4 Cl absorption data to complex kinetic mechanisms, rate coefficients at 298 K were found to be k (Cl+C 3 H 4; 656 Pa, N 2 ) = (1.61 ± 0.27) × 10 -10 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1, k (Cl+C 3 H 4; 670 Pa, He) = (1.34 ± 0.24) × 10 -10 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1, and k (Cl+C 3 H 4; 1330 Pa, He) = (1.75 ± 0. 25) × 10 -10 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . The rate coefficient of the self-reaction displayed no pressure dependence between 434 and 1347 Pa in N 2 buffer giving k (C 3 H 4 Cl+C 3 H 4 Cl) = (3.7 ± 1.0) × 10 -11 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . A study of the addition reaction of 2-chloroallyl radical and oxygen molecule determined σ 240 (C 3 H 4 ClO 2 ) = (3.6 ± 0.7) × 10 -18 cm 2 and k (O 2 +C 3 H 4 Cl, 705 Pa N 2 ) = (3.6 ± 0.4) × 10 -13 cm 3 molecule -1 s -1 . The listed uncertainties denote two standard deviations, and those for rate coefficients include the uncertainty of the appropriate absorption cross section.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Atkinson et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: