Why the study?
Does the breath-holding test produce a similar blood pressure response compared to the cold pressor test in normal and hypertensive persons?
Does the breath-holding test produce a similar blood pressure response compared to the cold pressor test in normal and hypertensive persons?
The study aims to compare the blood pressure response to the cold pressor test and the breath-holding test in 200 individuals, though results are not provided in the truncated abstract.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Results unavailable; leaves open whether breath-holding elicits BP responses comparable to cold pressor testing in normotensives and hypertensives.
Blood pressure rises in response to many stimuli in both normal and hypertensive persons. It is well known that the response is greater in patients with essential hypertension than it is in normal persons. In an attempt to devise a standard stimulus for measuring this reaction, Hines and Brown1developed the cold pressor test. More recently Ayman and Goldshine2described a breath-holding test for use as a standard blood pressure stimulus. They concluded that there was a striking similarity in the reactions of the blood pressure to the cold pressor and breath-holding tests. In their series the breathholding test, as a general rule, showed a greater reaction. Since the breath-holding test requires no special equipment, Ayman and Goldshine felt it might well be used in place of the cold pressor test. In order to compare the two tests, the reactions of 200 persons, some with normal and some
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Feldt (1941) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: