We have studied a near-resonant charge-exchange process between incident protons and a cesium vapor target. The cross section σ₊₀ for the production of all the neutral states of hydrogen decreases slightly with increasing energy. It varies from (10±{}3) ×{} 10^-15 cm² at 0.5 keV to (6.4±{}1.6) ×{} 10^-15 cm² at 2.5 keV. The cross section σ₊ₘ for the production of the 2S1/2 metastable state of hydrogen is (1.7±{}0.6) ×{} 10^-15 cm² at 2.4 keV. The percentage of metastable atoms in the outgoing neutral beam is found to be 0.27±{}0.08 for cesium target thickness less than 10¹³ atoms/cm². The outgoing fraction of H(2S1/2) atoms reaches a maximum equal to 0.13 for a cesium thickness of 1.2×{}10¹⁴ atoms/cm². The collisional quenching processes studied are the electron loss of H(2S1/2) on the noble gases H₂, N₂, and HI at 2.5 keV and the electron attachment of H(2S1/2) on N₂ at the same energy. The electron-loss cross sections σₘ₊, in units of 10^-16 cm², and known with a 35% uncertainty, are 4.1 for He, 2.7 for Ne, 2.9 for Ar, 2.7 for Kr, 6 for Xe, 3.4 for H₂, and 5 for N₂. The cross section σₘ₊ is always greater than σg+, the electron-loss cross section for the ground state of hydrogen. The maximum ratio 9.7 of these two cross sections is obtained with the halogen compound target HI, which is an interesting gas to selectively ionize H(2S1/2) in a beam containing the two species H(2S1/2) and H(1S1/2). A comparison of the data is made with theoretical predictions using an impulse approximation. Attachment cross sections of H(2S1/2) and H(1S1/2) have been measured on N₂ at 2.5 keV. We obtain σ_m-=(1.2±0.4)×10^-16 cm² and σ_g-=(9.7±2)×10^-18 cm².
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spiess et al. (1972) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: