Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A series of 101 patients with weakened neurological conditions (including multiple sclerosis and other demyelinating diseases) were augmented with dorsal column stimulation (DCS) over a 5 1/2-year period. 65 patients were implanted with an RF-linked system while 36 had a fully implantable programmable stimulator inserted. 20% failure occurred in the radio receiver series while none occurred in the latter, except for routine battery depletion. After 5 years, 23% of the patients using the RF system continued to use DCS, while after 4 years of using the fully implantable units, 81% of the patients continued to use DCS. Electrode displacement occurred in 27 patients, with breakage in a further 6 patients early in the series. Cathodal stimulation is more efficient that anodal stimulation when compared in 21 patients undergoing DCS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1981) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: