Key result
This paper is a study protocol for a systematic review and does not contain clinical trial results.
Systematic Review
This protocol outlines a systematic review to assess the quality of reporting of quality improvement methods and interventions in perioperative care using the TIDieR checklist.
No practice change from protocol alone; leaves open systematic evaluation of TIDieR reporting quality in perioperative QI.
BACKGROUND: Quality improvement (QI) methods are widely used in surgery in an effort to improve care, often using techniques such as Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles to implement specific interventions. Explicit definition of both the QI method and quality intervention is necessary to enable the accurate replication of effective interventions in practice, facilitate cumulative learning, reduce research waste and optimise benefits to patients. This systematic review aims to assess quality of reporting of QI methods and quality interventions in perioperative care. METHODS: Studies reporting on quality interventions implemented in perioperative care settings will be identified. Searches will be conducted in the Ovid SP version of Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care database and the related articles function of PubMed. The journal BMJ Quality will be searched separately. Search strategy terms will relate to (i) surgery, (ii) QI and (iii) evaluation methods. Explicit exclusion and inclusion criteria will be applied. Data from studies will be extracted using a data extraction form. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist will be used to evaluate quality of reporting, together with additional items aimed at assessing QI methods specifically. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO http://CRD42014012845.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2014) conducted a systematic review in Perioperative care quality improvement. Quality improvement methods and interventions was evaluated on Completeness of reporting of QI methods and quality interventions using the TIDieR checklist. This paper is a study protocol for a systematic review and does not contain clinical trial results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: