Why the study?
Is chronic depression more prevalent and clinically different in elderly patients compared to younger patients?
Is chronic depression more prevalent and clinically different in elderly patients compared to younger patients?
Late-life depression is more likely to be chronic than depression in younger patients, with distinct clinical features such as later onset and more relapses.
Supports closer monitoring for chronicity in late-life depression; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Aims of the study were to find the prevalence of chronic depression in elderly patients compared with younger patients, and to compare chronic depression between elderly and younger patients, to find if there were clinical differences. A major feature of the study was the inclusion of a large number of bipolar II patients, usually not included in previous studies. METHODS: Three hundred and ninety-nine consecutive unipolar (N=200) and bipolar II (N=199) depression outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV and depression rating scales in a private practice. RESULTS: Chronic depression was more common in elderly patients than in younger patients (53.6% vs 40.1%, p=0.0299). Late-life chronic depression patients had later age at onset, longer duration of illness, fewer bipolar II cases, more unipolar cases and more relapses than younger chronic depression patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that late-life depression is more likely to be chronic than depression in younger patients. The subtyping of chronic depression according to age seems supported by a different age at onset and some clinical differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franco Benazzi (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: