Key result
The Femoral Neck System was associated with peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures in four patients who had incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.
Why the study?
Peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures were observed following femoral neck system fixation for femoral neck fractures, prompting an investigation into this complication.
Does the femoral neck system (FNS) increase the risk of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures compared to other fixation methods in patients with femoral neck fractures?
Case Report (n=35)
No
Does the femoral neck system (FNS) increase the risk of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures compared to other fixation methods in patients with femoral neck fractures?
The femoral neck system may be associated with a previously unreported risk of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures, particularly in patients with incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.
May signal increased peri-implant fracture risk with FNS in incomplete fractures; hypothesis-generating and should not alter practice pending comparative data.
Background: The femoral neck system (FNS) is commonly used for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures and has shown promising results. However, we have observed cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures associated with the use of FNS at our institution. This case series aims to investigate four cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric fractures in patients treated with the FNS implant for femoral neck fractures. Case Presentation: We reviewed 35 patients who underwent treatment with FNS for femoral neck fractures between January 2017 and December 2021 at our level 1 trauma institution. Among these patients, four cases of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures were identified. In contrast, no such fractures occurred in patients treated with cannulated screws or dynamic hip screws (DHS). Interestingly, all four cases of peri-implant fractures were seen in patients with incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures. Only one case involved an identifiable technical error. Conclusions: This case series sheds light on peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures as a previously unreported complication associated with the use of FNS for femoral neck fractures. These fractures were observed exclusively in patients with incomplete nondisplaced fractures who received FNS fixation. No similar complications were observed in patients treated with other types of fixation. This finding suggests the need for caution and further investigation when considering FNS as a treatment option for this specific fracture pattern. The identification of peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures as a potential complication of FNS usage in incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures raises important considerations for clinical decision-making and patient management in orthopedic trauma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Femoral neck fractures (n=35). Femoral Neck System (FNS) vs. Cannulated screws or dynamic hip screws (DHS) was evaluated on Peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fracture. The Femoral Neck System was associated with peri-implant subtrochanteric femur fractures in four patients who had incomplete nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: