Key result
A 2-week overreaching protocol significantly increased the LF:HF ratio in sedentary females (P<=0.05) but not in active females, indicating increased sympathetic modulation.
Why the study?
Does a 2-week overreaching exercise protocol alter resting heart rate variability differently in active versus sedentary females?
Does a 2-week overreaching exercise protocol alter resting heart rate variability differently in active versus sedentary females?
A 2-week overreaching exercise protocol induces a more marked shift towards sympathetic cardiac modulation in sedentary females compared to active females.
May warrant HRV monitoring during intensified training in sedentary females; leaves open protective role of fitness in larger prospective studies.
Resting heart rate variability (HRV) profile was compared between sedentary and active females before, during, and after a 2-week overreaching protocol. Twenty currently active and 20 sedentary females were subdivided within their groups to either an experimental or control group. The active and sedentary experimental groups completed an overreaching protocol; endurance exercise, 40 minutes per session at an intensity of 70-90 % heart rate reserve, 7 d.wk(-1). The active experimental group showed an increase in low frequency power and a decrease in high frequency power over the intervention weeks (LF : HF ratio; Baseline = 2.0 [1.1], End week 1 = 2.4 [1.9], End week 2 = 3.2 [1.9], Recovery = 1.9 [1.0] mean [SD]) although this was not statistically significant (p > or = 0.05) for within group effects. The sedentary experimental group however, showed a significant (p < or = 0.05) increase in low frequency power and a decrease in high frequency power during the overreaching phase suggesting a move towards a predominance of resting sympathetic cardiac modulation (LF:HF ratio; Baseline = 1.6[1.1], End week 1 = 3.4 [1.6], End week 2 = 4.4 [3.0], Recovery = 1.8 [0.9]). These findings arose in the absence of any significant change in resting heart rate. Time domain analysis however failed to provide similar findings in either experimental group. Neither control group showed any significant changes. These data suggest a more marked change in sympathovagal balance in sedentary people when exposed to an overreaching protocol than in active individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winsley et al. (2005) studied Healthy active and sedentary (n=40). Overreaching protocol vs. Control group was evaluated on Resting heart rate variability (LF:HF ratio) (p=<=0.05). A 2-week overreaching protocol significantly increased the LF:HF ratio in sedentary females (P<=0.05) but not in active females, indicating increased sympathetic modulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: