Key result
Tolvaptan therapy significantly reduced the incidence of rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure (OR 0.191) compared to no tolvaptan in elderly patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Why the study?
No therapy has proven efficacy for improving clinical outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Does tolvaptan reduce rehospitalization due to worsening HF in elderly patients with HFpEF?
Observational (n=60)
No
Does tolvaptan reduce rehospitalization due to worsening HF in elderly patients with HFpEF?
Odds Ratio: 0.191 (95% CI 0.116–0.717)
Absolute Event Rate: 20.7% vs 58.1%
p-value: p=0.023
In elderly patients with HFpEF, tolvaptan therapy significantly reduced the length of hospital stay and the rate of rehospitalization without worsening renal function.
Should not yet change practice in elderly HFpEF; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm reduced rehospitalization.
Background: There is no known therapy with proven efficacy for improving clinical outcomes in elderly patients with heart failure (HF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of tolvaptan (TLV) in elderly HFpEF patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study involved 100 consecutive elderly HFpEF patients hospitalized at the Nagoya Heart Center, Japan. Inclusion criteria were: (1) patients aged ≥75 years; (2) first hospitalization secondary to HF; (3) received medical therapy for HF, without invasive treatment; and (4) clinical follow-up for >6 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was rehospitalization due to worsening HF, and the secondary endpoint was worsening renal function (WRF) during hospitalization and at 6 months after discharge. Sixty background-matched HFpEF patients were divided into 2 groups: with TLV therapy (TLV (+), n = 29) and without TLV therapy (TLV (–), n = 31). In the TLV (+) group, TLV therapy was continued after discharge. Clinical outcomes of these patients were evaluated. Results: Bed rest period and length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in the TLV (+) group than in the TLV (−) group. The dose of loop diuretics, mean serum creatinine levels, and incidence of WRF development were significantly lower in the TLV (+) group. Incidence of rehospitalization was also significantly lower in the TLV (+) group (log-rank test; p = 0.018). The multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that TLV therapy reduces the incidence of rehospitalization in elderly patients with HFpEF. Conclusions: TLV therapy reduced the bed rest period, length of hospital stay, and rate of rehospitalization without WRF in elderly HFpEF patients, suggesting that TLV could represent an effective therapy for this group of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=60). Tolvaptan vs. No tolvaptan therapy was evaluated on Rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure (OR 0.191, 95% CI 0.116-0.717, p=0.023). Tolvaptan therapy significantly reduced the incidence of rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure (OR 0.191) compared to no tolvaptan in elderly patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: