BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the inflammatory reaction at the site of overlapping drug-eluting stents (DES) in a porcine model of in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty bare metal stents (BMS) (group I; n=10), 20 sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) (group II: n=10), 20 paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) (group III: n=10), and 10 PES and 10 SES (group IV: n=10) were overlapped in the left anterior descending coronary arteries of 40 pigs. Follow-up coronary angiography and histopathology were performed at 4 weeks after stenting. For the overlapped segments, the minimal luminal diameter at 4 weeks was smaller in group I than in the other groups (1.78+/-0.13 mm, 2.79+/-0.09 mm, 2.90+/-0.04 mm, 2.80+/-0.07 mm, respectively; p<0.001), and the neointimal area (5.51+/-0.58 mm2, 2.38+/-0.53 mm2, 2.07+/-0.37 mm2, 2.39+/-0.58 mm2, respectively; p<0.001) and area stenosis (68.74+/-4.02%, 27.79+/-4.73%, 23.66+/-3.24%, 27.63+/-4.07%, respectively; p<0.001) were higher in group I than in the other groups; however, the inflammatory score was higher in group III than in the other groups (1.80+/-0.42, 2.10+/-0.32, 2.90+/-0.31, 2.50+/-0.52, respectively; p<0.001) and the endothelization score was lower in group III than in the other groups (2.80+/-0.42, 2.30+/-0.67, 1.30+/-0.48, 2.10+/-0.74, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with BMS, DES inhibit neointimal hyperplasia, but inflammation and poor endothelization occur at the site of overlapping stents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lim et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: