Why the study?
Does gentle digital rectal examination cause adverse clinical or electrocardiographic effects in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Does gentle digital rectal examination cause adverse clinical or electrocardiographic effects in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Routine digital rectal examination is safe in patients with acute myocardial infarction and yields clinically useful information for planning anticoagulation and bowel care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for digital rectal exam safety in acute MI; does not yet support routine practice change.
Rectal examination is believed dangerous and is commonly deferred or omitted in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To evaluate the safety and specific usefulness in this clinical setting of an otherwise routine procedure, a gentle digital rectal examination was performed on 86 patients with acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours after admission to the hospital. No adverse clinical or electrocardiographic effects were observed, and no angina pectoris was produced. The unsuspected presence of fecal occult blood, prostatic enlargement and voluminous, hard stool was encountered frequently enough to make rectal examination a useful adjunct in planning of anticoagulation, bladder and bowel care for this patient group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Earnest et al. (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: