Why the study?
Does biofeedback or suggestion improve the ability to raise finger temperature in hypnotized college women?
Does biofeedback or suggestion improve the ability to raise finger temperature in hypnotized college women?
Biofeedback significantly improves the ability to control skin temperature in hypnotized subjects compared to a false-feedback control.
Biofeedback may enhance temperature control in hypnosis; leaves open clinical utility pending replication in patient populations.
4 groups of 9 college women attempted to raise finger temperature relative to forehead temperature during hypnosis. After a hypnotic induction, each group of Ss received 1 of the following treatments for temperature control: (a) biofeedback, (b) suggestion and imagery, (c) biofeedback plus suggestion and imagery, and (d) a relaxation, false-feedback control. Croups were initially balanced for hypnotic susceptibility. Between-subject differences in baseline temperatures were statistically controlled. After 4 training sessions, only Ss in the groups receiving biofeedback and biofeedback plus suggestion and imagery demonstrated evidence of learned temperature control, and only Ss in the biofeedback group demonstrated a significantly greater ability to control skin temperature than Ss in the control group. Changes in temperature during hypnotic induction did not appear to affect changes during the subsequent treatment. There was no significant correlation between hypnotic susceptibility and temperature control for Ss in any group, contrary to popular assumption. Future research should attempt to ascertain if combined use of biofeedback and hypnosis offers any advantages to the use of biofeedback alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruce Crosson (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: