Key result
Skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in isolated CABG resulted in similar postoperative complications compared to single ITA use, with no wound complications in the BITA group.
Why the study?
BITA use in CABG is low due to concern for increased wound complications, particularly in obese, diabetic, and female patients, prompting examination of routine skeletonized BITA outcomes regardless of comorbidities.
Does routine use of skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery bypass grafting increase postoperative complications compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting in patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass operations?
Cohort
Does routine use of skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery bypass grafting increase postoperative complications compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting in patients undergoing isolated coronary bypass operations?
Routine use of skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting with specific wound-healing adjuncts does not increase postoperative complications compared to single arterial grafting.
May support skeletonized BITA without added complications in CABG; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The purpose of this retrospective review was to examine the morbidity and mortality associated with the routine use of skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) in coronary bypass surgery (CABG). The current rate of BITA use is reported to be 5% in the US. The literature reflects an increased incidence of wound complications, especially in obese, diabetic, and female patients. Our policy has been to use skeletonized BITA in patients regardless of comorbidities. Using the Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) database, the postoperative markers of prolonged ventilation (PV), length of stay (LOS), wound infection, death, and 30 day readmission were evaluated for all isolated coronary bypass operations (isocab) to allow comparison of bilateral and single internal thoracic artery (ITA) use during this four year period. The incidence of BITA use was 60%. The groups had similar comorbities and postop complications were similar regardless of single or bilateral thoracic artery use. Specifically, there were no wound complications in the BITA group. Adjuncts such as ITA skeletonization, platelet rich plasma, negative pressure wound dressing, and absence of bone wax were utilized in all cases. The added expense is justified to allow the expanded use of BITA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tyner et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Coronary bypass surgery (CABG). Skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic arteries (BITA) vs. Single internal thoracic artery (ITA) was evaluated on Postoperative markers of prolonged ventilation, length of stay, wound infection, death, and 30 day readmission. Skeletonized bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in isolated CABG resulted in similar postoperative complications compared to single ITA use, with no wound complications in the BITA group.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: