Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We study how financial development depends on trade openness and different types of institutions. In our model the elite can repress the financial market to keep their capital costs low and to preclude ordinary citizens from producing capitalintensive goods. Financial repression thus raises the price of these goods under autarky. For most world market prices, trade openness therefore makes financial repression less attractive and increases financial development. Better political institutions increase financial development by making financial repression more costly for the elite. Better contracting institutions have countervailing effects on financial development. These predictions are consistent with the existing empirical evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2011 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: