Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and treatment burden of intravitreal ranibizumab (RBZ) combined with a dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant compared to ranibizumab monotherapy for macular edema (ME) secondary to non-ischemic retinal vein occlusion (RVO). Methods: This retrospective controlled study included 138 patients (139 eyes) with treatment-naïve non-ischemic RVO-ME (including both branch and central retinal vein occlusions) diagnosed at Sanmenxia Eye Hospital between 2020 and 2024. Eyes were categorized into two groups: the monotherapy group (RBZ, n=68), receiving standard "3+PRN" ranibizumab; and the combination group (RBZ+DEX, n=71), receiving sequential therapy comprising an initial ranibizumab injection followed by a DEX implant (Ozurdex) within 2-4 weeks, with subsequent PRN retreatment. Primary outcomes included mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT), as well as the proportion of eyes achieving clinically significant visual gain (>0.3 logMAR) and anatomical resolution (CMT <300 μm). Secondary outcomes quantified treatment burden (injection frequency) and safety profiles. To address potential confounding variables between the two RVO subtypes, all outcomes were further evaluated through a stratified subgroup analysis. Conclusion: Sequential therapy with ranibizumab and dexamethasone implant offers superior clinical efficacy over ranibizumab monotherapy for RVO-ME. This regimen leverages a synergistic mechanism to provide better mid- to long-term visual gains, faster anatomical restoration, and a reduced treatment burden. The safety profile remains favorable with manageable risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: