Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Proposes a theoretical model linking chronic stress, vital exhaustion, and neuroendocrine-immune interactions to the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction.
An enduring state of exhaustion as opposed to chronic hostility-a long-term risk factor-has been found to be a more proximal precursor of myocardial infarction. The strength of the association with exhaustion suggests that this behavioral factor reflects not only a breakdown in adaptation to chronic stressors but also the disease process itself. Recent research on the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction lends credence to a role for immunological factors. herein, we outline a two-stage theoretical model, postulating a feedback relationship between behavior, associated neuroendocrine changes, immunological responses, and the pathogenesis of this disease. We propose a long-term first stage consisting of chronic hostility, prolonged occupational over-exertion, and exposure to other life stressors, terminating eventually in a much shorter second stage of 'vital exhaustion'. Stressor-associated neuroendocrine changes result in immunosuppression leading to reactivation of latent, systemic infections (such as cytomegalovirus) and potentially to autoimmune reactions as well. The consequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines exacerbates fatigue and induces a stimulus for cytokine production in brain. This cytokine production stimulates a chronically activated, over-compensated limbic-hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, resulting in a dampened response, continued exhaustion, and a potential 'reverberating circuit' between behavior, neuroendocrine change, cytokine release and coronary artery occlusion, culminating in myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goodkin et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: