Key result
The EACH score demonstrated superior predictive performance for perioperative stroke in external validation with an AUC of 0.784 (95% CI 0.694-0.871) compared to a traditional score.
Why the study?
Machine learning can enhance performance by capturing nonlinear interactions, but ML-based models have limitations in interpretability.
Does the EACH score improve the prediction of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery compared to traditional scores?
Observational (n=38,737)
Yes
Does the EACH score improve the prediction of perioperative stroke in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery compared to traditional scores?
The EACH score, an explainable machine learning-based tool, provides superior prediction of perioperative stroke in noncardiac surgery compared to traditional scoring systems.
EACH score enables interpretable ML-based health risk assessment; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) has the potential to enhance performance by capturing nonlinear interactions. However, ML-based models have some limitations in terms of interpretability. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop and validate a more comprehensible and efficient ML-based scoring system using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. METHODS: We developed and validated the Explainable Automated nonlinear Computation scoring system for Health (EACH) framework score. We developed a CatBoost-based prediction model, identified key features, and automatically detected the top 5 steepest slope change points based on SHAP plots. Subsequently, we developed a scoring system (EACH) and normalized the score. Finally, the EACH score was used to predict perioperative stroke. We developed the EACH score using data from the Seoul National University Hospital cohort and validated it using data from the Boramae Medical Center, which was geographically and temporally different from the development set. RESULTS: When applied for perioperative stroke prediction among 38,737 patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, the EACH score achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.829 (95% CI 0.753-0.892). In the external validation, the EACH score demonstrated superior predictive performance with an AUC of 0.784 (95% CI 0.694-0.871) compared with a traditional score (AUC=0.528, 95% CI 0.457-0.619) and another ML-based scoring generator (AUC=0.564, 95% CI 0.516-0.612). CONCLUSIONS: The EACH score is a more precise, explainable ML-based risk tool, proven effective in real-world data. The EACH score outperformed traditional scoring system and other prediction models based on different ML techniques in predicting perioperative stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oh et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Perioperative stroke (n=38,737). EACH score vs. Traditional score and another ML-based scoring generator was evaluated on Perioperative stroke prediction (AUC in external validation) (AUC 0.784, 95% CI 0.694-0.871). The EACH score demonstrated superior predictive performance for perioperative stroke in external validation with an AUC of 0.784 (95% CI 0.694-0.871) compared to a traditional score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: