Key result
Acute myocardial infarction in adolescents requires a personalized clinical approach to identify and treat underlying causes, which frequently differ from conventional atherosclerotic processes.
Why the study?
Although acute MI is increasing in adolescents due to premature atherosclerosis and non-atherosclerotic causes, it is not commonly considered the most likely cause of chest pain in this group, posing significant risk of dramatic outcomes.
Acute myocardial infarction in adolescents requires a personalized diagnostic approach, as underlying causes frequently differ from conventional atherosclerosis and include non-atherosclerotic mechanisms.
Supports etiology-specific evaluation in adolescent MI; leaves open optimal management strategies.
Worldwide, a myocardial infarction (MI) is an important cause of death. Acute MI occurs most commonly at an older age. However, the incidence of acute MI in adolescents is increasing. This is partly due to an increase in cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. smoking, unhealthy diet), which might lead to premature atherosclerosis. However, several non-atherosclerotic causes of MI in adolescents are also described in the literature, such as vascular spasm due to the use of cocaine. We may assume that acute MI is not considered to be the most likely cause of chest pain in adolescents. Therefore, the risk of a dramatic outcome in this patient category may be significant. This point of view article addresses the pathophysiological process and subsequent diagnostic approach in adolescents with MI resulting from either premature atherosclerosis or of non-atherosclerotic causes. Insight into the potential operational mechanisms of the coronary artery incident may have a major impact on the clinical course following admission. We would like to underline that a personalised clinical approach remains of utmost importance in each patient treated by protocolised medicine. This is particularly true when acute MI occurs at a young age, since the underlying cause more frequently differs from the conventional atherosclerotic process in this patient category.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoot et al. (2020) conducted a review in Acute myocardial infarction. Personalized clinical approach vs. Protocolized medicine was evaluated. Acute myocardial infarction in adolescents requires a personalized clinical approach to identify and treat underlying causes, which frequently differ from conventional atherosclerotic processes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: