Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This essay argues that Knafo and Teschke fundamentally misread Brenner’s original contribution to the transition debate. They equate his rejection of trans-historical or trans-modal laws of motion with the notion that social-property relations do not have strong rules of reproduction that structure the actions of agents and give rise to ‘developmental patterns’ specific to each form of social labour. Knafo and Teschke’s critique of Brenner’s analysis of capitalist expansion and crisis is also theoretically and empirically questionable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charles Post (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: